Let me be honest: choosing between Oyster HR and Globalization Partners for global hiring is trickier than most comparison articles make it seem. You’ll find plenty of feature comparisons, but what really matters is understanding that these platforms serve different market segments – Oyster charges $599/employee targeting mid-market companies with employee experience focus and user-friendly technology, while Globalization Partners charges $900-1,200+/employee for enterprises needing premium white-glove service and comprehensive consulting.
I’ve been analyzing EOR platforms for the past few years, and I keep seeing the same thing: companies compare these two because both have strong reputations, then realize months later that one is built for tech-forward efficiency while the other is built for enterprise-grade consulting and support. Oyster built its reputation on employee-centric features with dedicated support teams and owned-entity infrastructure, while Globalization Partners positioned itself as the premium EOR with comprehensive global expansion consulting and hands-on account management. Both work really well, but they’re built for completely different company sizes and service expectations.
The real decision comes down to what matters most to you: Oyster works best when you need employee experience focus with modern technology at mid-market pricing, while Globalization Partners is better for enterprises that prioritize comprehensive consulting, premium support, and aren’t constrained by budget. Your company size, budget flexibility, and whether you need self-service efficiency versus full-service consulting will determine which trade-offs actually matter.
My goal is to help you understand how these platforms actually work in practice, so you can decide if Oyster’s $599/employee employee-centric platform with dedicated support or Globalization Partners’ $900-1,200/employee premium consulting service fits your expansion strategy and budget reality better.
